The Invisible Defeat

By Wasteland Crusader

Is America under military occupation? This is a question that sounds like it belongs in the realm of one of the many, eye-roll worthy, alternate history novels involving a hypothetical victory by Axis forces in WWII. There are no foreign tanks rolling down our streets, no soldiers surrounding our capitol. These are the means of force that we associate with national power, but do all nations exert force in the same way? Land powers such as Russia or China are known for their tanks and armies, maritime powers such as the US or UK are known for their ships and planes. However, open use of military force has become more taboo, and the threat of nuclear conflict has made it more dangerous. Even conventionally powerful nations such as the United States prefer to use financial sanctions to coerce enemies. The ability to use financial attacks as a replacement for military force opens up opportunities for irregular nations. No longer is it required to leverage industry and manpower to occupy a rival. A nation that dominates the flow of capital in another can achieve the same supremacy over this vulnerable rival that a grand fleet can achieve over an island nation. Superficially, the State of Israel is a small, beleaguered state in a poor and dysfunctional region of the world. A more in-depth look shows that Israel's boundaries are not confined by "the river and the sea." Those who are not hypnotized by modern Liberalism recognize that a nation is fundamentally just a people. As an irregular, diaspora people, the Jewish nation has mastered the use of irregular force to subdue our blind behemoth of a country.

Sources of Power

A spat has broken out on X recently over whether the term "Globalist American Empire" or "Zionist Occupied Government" better describes the current American regime. Those who believe that Globalism, Liberalism, or "Wokeism" as opposed to Zionism is the dominate ideology of our elite point to how the majority of our Jewish elite is secular, liberal, and not especially supportive of Israel's extreme actions. While they admit that Jews tend to be more liberal, they believe that it's the shared liberal ideology that unites our elite, as opposed to Jewish identity. Zionists are seen as only being concerned with the niche issue of Israel, and exerting little influence on the rest of society outside of certain areas of foreign policy.

The problem with this line of thinking is that power is not defined by who controls "most" of society. Power is defined by the ability to achieve core objectives, and Zionists have acquired exactly the positions in our government necessary to do that. The so called "woke" may be able to use control of HR departments to terrorize low level employees at any company in the country, but power over these disenfranchised Trump supporters matters little compared to having the ability to terrorize national governments, representing untold resources. The power of a Roman Caesar came through his legions, and the legions of today are the military and financial means the United States uses to subdue its rivals. Power over America's Empire matters far more than power over the lives of everyday Americans. They also go hand in hand. National governments have access to more wealth than any private citizen or company, and they also recognize that appeasing those who control America's legions is incredibly important for their nation's security and prosperity. Thus, those who pull the levers of America's Empire rake in massive amounts of money in concealed bribes, usually through highly paid "jobs" going to family members (Hunter Biden and the Ukrainian gas company) or donations to "charities" (Saudi contributions to Clinton Foundation). Access to this flow of wealth can quickly enrichen those in control of foreign policy, this wealth can then be easily used to influence domestic politics. If Zionists do not occupy most domestic political positions, it's simply because they don't really care about transgender bathrooms or Dr. Seuss being cancelled. The best way to determine who's in charge is to see who gets their way when there's a conflict between the two sides. Recently, the "woke", black, female dean of Harvard (the most prestigious college in the world) was rapidly ousted simply for not cracking down hard enough on pro-Palestinian students. The tactics were familiar, financial threats, legal threats, and media attacks. So, when Zionists want their way in domestic politics, they get it. Zionist influence over our more critical foreign policy is far more apparent, as is clear from Joe Biden begging Israel to stop their brutal campaign in Gaza, which is severly detrimental to US relations with Muslim states. Israel told Biden to pound sand, and Biden won't even consider attempting to use ample US leverage to change Israel's behavior. While it's clear that influence over foreign policy is a larger source of power than influence over domestic policy, some may still claim that Zionist influence is limited to the Middle East. Let's analyze another example to see just how far this influence goes. One of the most irrational aspects of American foreign policy recently has been our fanatic hostility towards Russia.

Russia and Syria

Globalists have recognized since the Obama administration that China is the only real threat to US global hegemony, and can only really be defeated with an "encircling" coalition. Russia would be critical here due to its natural resources. China is not resource rich on its own, and without Russian energy, it would struggle to sustain a war against the West. With Russian energy, however, China's immense industrial capacity would likely sweep away a decaying US Navy. For this reason, Globalists prior to 2014 attempted to mend relations with Russia. Hillary Clinton theatrically pushed a giant red "reset" button with Russian Secretary of State Sergei Lavrov in 2012. Globalist Obama rightfully mocked Zionist Romney on the debate state for saying Russia was the top threat to our country. Even as late as 2021, Biden sought a "stable and predictable" relationship with Putin and lifted sanctions on the Russian Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline. So how has this obvious strategy been so horribly derailed?

Despite the fact that most US government officials have desired a "pivot to China" for years, policy is not determined by the majority, it tends to be driven by the "intolerant minority". If 70% of government officials favor one policy, but are mostly apathetic about it, while 30% favor another policy, but are far more organized, willing to viciously attack any opposition, and dedicate 100% of their energy in this direction, they can easily overwhelm an apathetic majority.

Let's look at the timeline for the deterioration of our relationship with Russia. While most discussion focuses on the 2022 "Special Military Operation" in Ukraine, the war really began in 2014 when a US backed coup overthrew the pro-Russian government of Ukraine, leading to the Russian annexation of Crimea and the Donbass rebellion. What else was going on in this time period? The Syrian civil war started in 2011 and Russia intervened to save Assad in 2015. Overthrowing Assad has been a long term objective of Israel, to secure its northern border. A dilemna arose for Zionists in our government, how to prevent Russia from intervening to save the reeling Assad? Bogging Russia down fighting an insurgency in Ukraine and hitting it with crippling sanctions would certainly prevent any distant military deployments. Many have pointed out how the US has no actual strategy for defeating Russia in Ukraine. Even in their fantasy scenario where Ukraine routs the Russian army on the battlefield, Russia would simply use nuclear weapons. This is because the goal wasn't defeating Russia, it was constraining it. Unfortunately for the Zionists, Putin outplayed them. He avoided a large scale war in Ukraine, only seizing Crimea, even though he could likely have seized the whole nation. Putin saved Assad and then waited until Syria was secure to solve the Ukraine problem. By the time it became clear that the Zionist strategy failed, it was too late to get off the collision course with Russia.

A Foolish Alliance

A natural question arises. Since Zionists probably don't care that much about American domestic policy, could we simply ally with them, allow them to control foreign policy, while we control domestic policy? Why this alliance cannot possibly function can be best seen by looking at the Cold War. Frustrated at opposition to Israel's war in 1967 on the left and the USSR's support of the Arab States in the 1973 war, a faction of left wing Jews defected from the Left and joined the Right, this was the origin of the Neoconservative movement. While conservatives were hostile to the USSR because it was atheistic and communist, Neocons were hostile to it because it was threatening Israel. These two sides naturally joined forces and landslide victories for Republicans resulted in 1980, 1984, and 1988. Both sides acheived their short term objective when the USSR collapsed in 1991. But what about their long term objectives? In this sense, the conservatives were totally routed. While they were obsessed with defeating communism overseas, they were blindsided as their own country was totally highjacked by left wing extremists and its culture became just as godless and even more immoral than the late USSR. Did the Zionist Neocons suffer a similar fate? No, actually quite the opposite. They seized total control of our foreign policy and went on a Middle Eastern shooting spree against Israel's enemies. Iraq, Libya, and Afghanistan were neutralized and Syria was destabilized. They had little trouble launching a major proxy war against nuclear armed Russia. Why did this happen? Despite some disagreements, Zionists benefit immensely from the control that liberal Jews have over domestic society. Liberal Jews recognize that any criticism of Zionist Jewish influence could easily backfire on themselves, and so they use their money and media influence to suppress it. Zionists will not risk this protection by seriously challenging the power of liberal Jewry. They are also aware that while liberal Jews will occassionally balk at some of Israel's most barbaric actions, they're still far more sympathetic to the Jewish state than any gentile elite would be. The other issue is focus, given the tall task of removing an entrenched regime, all of our resources and energy must be focused on this task. Zionists, however, are primarily concerned with Israel and will drag our attention towards fighting wars on its behalf.

China

Given that Zionists have repeatedly undermined US efforts to confront China, and that Zionists are our enemy, does this mean we should support a hostile policy towards China? A coolheaded look shows that this would be incredibly foolhardy and misguided. Zionists are not friendly with China, they simply consider China to be a threat on the backburner relative to more immediate threats to Israel's security. US hegemony has been very beneficial to Israel, so Zionists will happily support aggression towards China, as long as it doesn't take priority over protecting Israel. Ultimately, our national problems are the fault of our own regime, not any foreign power. Fighting China to ensure another century of global domination for the Zionist regime that hates us would be the height of stupidity. Some have used the persecution of Christians in China as a reason for WWIII. To the extent that this is actually happening, and not simply US regime propoganda, China's motives for doing so should be examined. Most of these Christian churches have ties with the West, which is obviously very hostile to China at the moment. It seems a reasonable concern that CIA agents could infiltrate China through these churches. Given the fact that the ADL and Israel are known to have blackmail files on high level people all over our society, it's hard to believe that our churches have remained unscathed, especially given their historical role in "anti-semitism." Taking that into account, the best way to stop any persecution of Christians would be to deescalate tensions with China so that this is less of a concern for them, and to remove our current regime. It's also important to remember, that if we're looking at which group is most hostile towards Christianity, that group would indisputably be the Jews, who are also running our own country. Jews have a constant paranoia and bitterness over the "persecution" they've faced from Christians historically, as well as the fact that Christianity nullifies their religion. Ron Unz's article "On the Oddities of the Jewish Religion" describes how they consider Christians to be their mortal enemy, will mutter curses at churches, and Christ is repeatedly blasphemed in their Talmud.

If we're going to define an occupation as one nation removing the sovereignty of another through force, it seems indisputable that our country is under Zionist occupation, and that this describes our situation far better than "Globalist American Empire." Zionists have their hands on the highest levers of power in our society, and use that power to ensure that the managerial class of our country remains unable or unwilling to challenge them. Anyone who attempts to resist this arrangement is swiftly met with crushing financial penalties, media defamation, and legal attacks. This is different only superficially from the USSR rolling tanks into Budapest or Prague. Recognizing this occupation is paramount, otherwise, we will continue to exist as a defeated nation, impotently flailing at the henchmen of the real regime.